By: Rudy
Date: 2009-12-08
Time: 20:40
|
Unexpected result with parentgrp and headergrp/footergrpHi,
I recently found that combining parentgrp and headergrp leads to an unexpected result. Consider having following data (pastie): http://pastie.org/734110 That is: state > country > region > city. I used the following template:
State and country have to reside in their own <div>'s for styling purposes, I assume parentgrp would be right for that. Within the table I need a header showing the region's name, this then would be a headergrp. For checking purposes I also added a footergrp just displaying the same regionname. There are 3 states, each of which has 3 countries, each with 3 regions with 3 cities. I would expect a list in following order:
but the result is:
Is the combination of parentgrp and headergrp not allowed, did I miss something or is it buggy? Thanks. Rudy |
|||
By: Rudy
Date: 2009-12-08
Time: 20:45
|
Re: Unexpected result with parentgrp and headergrp/footergrpNever mind, I missed block=tr in the headergrp and footergrp. Really creative. Would have saved me work seeing this earlier :) Thanks anyways.
|
|||
By: Skrol29
Date: 2009-12-09
Time: 10:31
|
Re: Unexpected result with parentgrp and headergrp/footergrp:)
|